|  Molecule Types Vibrational Structure Vibrational Energy Levels and
              Franck-Condon Factors | <Prev Next> | 
The key parameters required for a simulation of a vibrational spectrum are summarized in Making a basic data file for simulating vibrational structure. The steps below show how to do this for the first band in the photoelectron spectrum of water, using literature values for constants where available. See the related worked example, Predicting the Photoelectron Spectrum of H2O using ab inito Calculations for an alternative approach.
An excellent compilation of spectroscopy constants for can be found in the NIST Chemistry web book at http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/. A formula search on H2O with ions not excluded yields information on several isotopes; selecting the main isotope and then "Vibrational and/or electronic energy levels" yields for H2O:
| Sym Species | No | Approximate type of mode | Selected Freq | 
| a1 | 1 | Sym str | 3657 | 
| a1 | 2 | Bend | 1595 | 
| b1 | 3 | Anti str | 3756 | 
Confusingly the asymmetric stretch, v3, is shown as
        having b1 symmetry in this table, though the modern
        convention is to classify this mode as b2. The b2
        symmetry follows if the out of plane axis is chosen to be the x axis, the current
        convention, while b1 symmetry follows if the out of
        plane axis is chosen to be the y axis. The choice is not
        necessarily important for the simulation, but it is important to
        be consistent.
      
Selecting "Gas phase ion energetics data" gives an ionization
        potential of 12.621 eV; see below for some discussion of this
        value.
      
For the ion information on several states is available; taking
        just the most recent ground state (X state) gas phase values:
      
| Vib Sym | No | Approximate type of mode | cm-1 | 
| a1 | 1 | Sym stretch | 3197.97 | 
| a1 | 2 | Bend | 1408.42 | 
| b2 | 3 | Asym Stretch | 3253.91 | 
Note that the asymmetric stretch is shown as b2
        here. More detailed simulations would have to consider
        anharmonicities.
      
This should be enough for a basic simulation; press the
        simulate button ( ) and then the all
        button (
) and then the all
        button ( ) and you should see a simulation,
        though it will essentially have only one peak as we are assuming
        no geometry change on ionization.
) and you should see a simulation,
        though it will essentially have only one peak as we are assuming
        no geometry change on ionization.
      
It is important to check simulations, not only because it is easy to make mistakes in the steps above, but also because there can be differences in the definitions of the constants or other factors, such as the different choice of symmetry for the asymmetric stretch described above. Checking against tabulated line positions or published spectra is an effective check; note the facility for overlaying pictures (from a Journal for example) onto a simulation.
    In this case an experimental simulation is
        available from R. N. Dixon, G. Duxbury, J. W. Rabalais and L.
        Åsbrink, "Ro-vibronic structure in the photoelectron
        spectra of H2O, D2O and HDO", Molecular
        Physics, 31, 423, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268977600100311.
        This shows that, while the first peak is indeed the strongest,
        about ¼ of the intensity is in the other peaks. Manually
        adjusting the vibrational displacements to v1 = 0.07, v2 = 0.07
        gives a reasonable match for the observed intensities. As a
        final point, the peaks are all shifted from the simulation - the
        strongest peak is simulated at 12.550 eV but measured at 12.624
        eV. The difference here (0.074) is likely to be the zero point
        energy; this could be checked by looking at the individual
        vibrational levels - selecting "View", "States".  Adding 0.074eV = 600 cm-1
        to the ion origin brings the spectra into line, as shown in the
        plot below.
      
